Experts in aesthetic surgery, dermatology, and beauty bring you the latest trends, research, and advice to help you make informed decisions about your appearance and health.
A web platform dedicated to aesthetic surgery, dermatology, and beauty, where expertise meets innovation, and your desires and needs become our mission. In a world where appearance and health go hand in hand, our platform leads the revolution, delivering the latest trends, research, and expert advice directly to you.
Our team consists of highly skilled professionals in the fields of aesthetic surgery and dermatology, committed to providing reliable information and guidance that will help you make informed choices about your appearance and well-being. We understand that every individual has unique needs and desires, which is why we approach each person with the utmost care and professionalism.
Powered by Aestetica Web Design © 2024
In a country that exports wind turbines, minimalist furniture, and existential dread wrapped in Nordic noir, Marie Bach Hansen is a disruption. She was raised in the quiet town of Borum—yes, the Borum in Denmark, not the one invented for a pastoral novel—making Marie Bach Hansen’s Danish roots feel more like a curveball than a résumé highlight.
While the rest of the world was tracking down actors from New York or London, the idea of Marie Bach Hansen coming from Borum might’ve sounded like a typo. And yet, it fits. Her beginnings weren’t loud, Instagrammable, or media-engineered. She grew up without handlers, hype, or hustle—just an unnervingly natural presence.
She didn’t need red carpets or drama school brochures plastered across the town square. Before she even set foot on a national stage, Marie Bach Hansen had internalized something essential: ubiquity isn’t a prerequisite for impact.
There’s a peculiar gravity to performers raised outside the spotlight. Their instincts turn inward, sharper, stranger. That’s the path Marie Bach Hansen followed—not towards applause, but away from predictability.
While her contemporaries rehearsed how to be seen, she mastered the art of making people look twice. From her earliest stage appearances, she never played to the cheap seats. Her expressions were half-concealed. Her pauses hit harder than punchlines. And if you were lucky enough to catch one of those early performances, you probably didn’t clap—you exhaled.
So yes, people may now search for Marie Bach Hansen’s birth date—June 28, 1985—but by the time the Googling started, the important part had already happened. The world didn’t discover her in Borum. It just took a while to realize it had to catch up.
If you imagine the Danish National School of Performing Arts as a gentle cradle for fragile egos, forget it. It’s a place where the artifice is stripped down to nerves, where students either disintegrate or reconfigure themselves from bone to brainstem. And Marie Bach Hansen’s education was nothing short of a self-imposed teardown.
The school—also known as Statens Teaterskole—was never about teaching you how to act. It taught you how to bleed convincingly without making a sound. While others memorized lines, Marie Bach Hansen studied subtext with the discipline of a field surgeon. She didn’t audition for emotions; she reverse-engineered them.
Yes, Marie Bach Hansen has often been labeled a theater actress, and while technically accurate, it’s also laughably insufficient. That phrase might suggest someone who projects with clarity and exits stage left. What it misses is her talent for destruction—of the fourth wall, of the expected, of your comfort zone.
Her tenure at Statens Teaterskole built more than performance chops. It sharpened her into someone who uses silence like a monologue and tension like oxygen. And if you’re tempted to reduce Marie Bach Hansen’s education to a credential, you’ve misunderstood her entirely. It wasn’t a stepping stone—it was a weapon forged.
Before she ever glared at a Netflix camera, Marie Bach Hansen was quietly dismantling expectations at Mungo Park—Denmark’s stage for the daring, the raw, and the unapologetically weird. It wasn’t just a venue; it was a creative crucible where she burned off every trace of theatrical vanity.
Her work there wasn’t gentle. It didn’t beg for applause. It dared audiences to flinch. And while lesser actors reached for volume, she dealt in silence, stares, and weaponized stillness. Even at Betty Nansen Theater, she proved again and again: give her a black box and a single light, and she’ll leave a psychological crater.
When critics reference Marie Bach Hansen’s theater performances, they often fail to grasp their quiet brutality. Her stage presence isn’t designed to entertain—it’s built to interrogate.
She doesn’t play characters. She dissects them. And in venues like Mungo Park, where polite narrative structure goes to die, her work never sought approval. It asked for surrender.
If you look at the scope of Marie Bach Hansen’s theater roles, the variety may appear impressive. But the truth is sharper: she doesn’t shift between roles. She transforms the air around them. Audiences don’t just watch her—they reconsider everything they thought the play would be.
And no, she’s never played someone harmless. You don’t go to see Marie Bach Hansen expecting mercy. You go expecting impact—and you leave knowing you got more than you bargained for.
When Marie Bach Hansen’s role in The Legacy aired, the Danish TV landscape didn’t just gain a new protagonist—it gained a provocation. As Signe Larsen, she didn’t play a hero or a villain. She played something far more volatile: a woman unbothered by your expectations.
The Legacy (original title: Arvingerne) didn’t need melodrama—it needed sharp teeth in soft voices. That’s exactly what Marie Bach Hansen delivered. In a series obsessed with inheritance, both literal and emotional, her performance operated like a scalpel. Audiences watched Marie Bach Hansen’s Signe Larsen not to be comforted, but to be confronted.
Unlike many prestige dramas that lean on visual spectacle, The Legacy asked for internal combustion. And Marie Bach Hansen in The Legacy TV series delivered a masterclass in what it means to destabilize a room with a single glance.
She didn’t chase attention—she withdrew it. She didn’t emote—she edged around implosion. Where other actors might shout their way into an audience’s memory, Hansen simply let silence thicken until the tension could be cut with a butter knife—and then twisted the blade.
What made Marie Bach Hansen’s performance in Arvingerne so unnerving was its refusal to moralize. She made it impossible to take sides. Signe wasn’t a cipher. She was a challenge. And that’s when people started realizing: this wasn’t just a breakout role. This was a warning shot.
For many actors, a strong debut becomes a trap: repeat the formula, sell the persona, stay marketable. Marie Bach Hansen had no interest in that hamster wheel. After The Legacy, she didn’t cement an archetype—she detonated it.
From the emotionally intricate drama of This Life, to the barren, tension-drenched landscapes of White Sands, and the cross-border mystery in The Team, she refused to become her own cliché. If the show’s genre changed, so did her energy. If the tone shifted, so did her temperature. Watching Marie Bach Hansen’s filmography is less about spotting the similarities and more about wondering how one person could possibly pull all this off.
In This Life, she weaponized realism. In White Sands, she buried it in silence. In The Team, she danced between dialects and jurisdictions. Each time, she didn’t just play a character. She slipped inside a different emotional rulebook.
Despite the genre-swapping and mood shifts, there is one constant in Marie Bach Hansen’s work: control. Not rigidity—discipline. She doesn’t act like someone hoping to be liked. She acts like someone who knows the camera owes her its full attention.
Her filmography reads like a roadmap through risk. She has no franchise cushion, no default heroine template, no reliance on charm. Instead, she’s chased roles that flirt with opacity. Characters who live in ambiguity. People who’d rather fracture than conform.
What sets Marie Bach Hansen’s performances in This Life, White Sands, and The Team apart is their refusal to telegraph. She’s the kind of performer who dares the audience to misread her—and seems to relish it when they do.
It’s one thing to pivot from national television to international cinema—it’s another thing to do it with such surgical calm that no one sees it coming. But that’s exactly what Marie Bach Hansen did when she appeared in The Last Vermeer.
Set in post-WWII Europe and soaked in moral ambiguity, the film wasn’t interested in Hollywood sentiment. And Marie Bach Hansen’s role in The Last Vermeer matched that tone perfectly. She didn’t emote for the front row—she navigated a character with precision and detachment, allowing implication to do the heavy lifting.
This wasn’t a debut designed for applause. It was an entrance designed to haunt casting directors who thought they knew what a European actress was supposed to deliver.
By the time audiences began compiling lists of Marie Bach Hansen’s movies and TV shows, it became clear her film choices weren’t based on visibility—they were based on psychological architecture. Whether the medium was television or cinema, the question remained the same: how deep can she go before the character stops being fiction?
Her film roles have followed a quiet pattern—selective, brutal, and intellectually loaded. There’s no fluff. No glossy romantic detours. She doesn’t sell lifestyle. She sells intensity. And that makes Marie Bach Hansen’s transition from prestige TV to serious cinema feel less like a leap and more like an inevitability.
She isn’t on screen to reassure you. She’s there to dismantle you. Frame by frame. Line by line. Until you forget you’re watching a performance and start feeling like you’ve been caught in one.
You don’t watch Marie Bach Hansen in The Reserve. You get slowly pulled under. Her portrayal of Cecilie doesn’t scream for attention—it stalks it. This isn’t a character drawn from emotion; it’s carved from denial, class guilt, and fragile self-righteousness. It’s a role that could’ve easily slipped into trope: the privileged woman “discovering” injustice. But Marie Bach Hansen doesn’t give us that cliché. She gives us someone who can’t quite look away—and who’s never entirely innocent of what she sees.
As Cecilie, Marie Bach Hansen delivers a performance that feels like psychological weather: unpredictable, oppressive, and impossible to ignore. The beauty of her acting is that it never asks the audience for empathy. She makes Cecilie’s discomfort so palpably authentic, so deeply embedded in her facial micro-movements, that you’re not sure whether to root for her or report her.
And that’s what makes Marie Bach Hansen’s Cecilie in The Reserve so terrifyingly effective—she’s not navigating morality. She’s circling the drain of her own compromised conscience.
It would’ve been easy to play Cecilie as either hero or hypocrite. Marie Bach Hansen chose neither. Instead, she threads her performance through the quiet terror of realization. The disappearance of Ruby isn’t just a plot device—it’s a mirror Cecilie has no choice but to stare into.
Every line Hansen delivers is charged with subtext. Her silences say more than most screenplays. Her hesitations are brutal. Her voice, too calm. Her posture, too exact. It’s the acting equivalent of slow poisoning—a performance that destabilizes scene after scene without ever raising its voice.
The Reserve, or Reservatet, is a drama where privilege becomes horror. And in that moral purgatory, Marie Bach Hansen’s role in The Reserve on Netflix isn’t just the anchor—it’s the tremor that shakes everything loose.
Putting Per Fly in charge of a drama about class, guilt, and violence is like handing a scalpel to someone who knows exactly where to cut. Known for turning human flaws into narrative fuel, Per Fly as director of The Reserve brings his signature moral ambiguity and structural tension to the series—and it shows in every claustrophobic frame.
This isn’t just stylish Nordic TV. It’s architectural dread. And The Reserve, under Fly’s direction, uses every hallway, every dinner table, every designer sofa as terrain in a war no one admits is happening.
Marie Bach Hansen, under Fly’s camera, is captured with surgical precision. She’s never glamorized. She’s examined. The director doesn’t chase drama—he stages slow-burn detonations. And The Reserve, as a result, functions like a high-tension wire: perfectly quiet, until it electrocutes the viewer.
If Fly directs the implosion, Ingeborg Topsøe lights the fuse. As the screenwriter behind The Reserve, she doesn’t write “lines”—she writes traps. Her dialogue isn’t there to explain. It’s there to expose.
Topsøe has a brutal talent for language that implies more than it reveals. And that’s exactly the kind of script that Marie Bach Hansen thrives in—one where tone is threat, and subtext is character. Cecilie doesn’t explain herself. She implicates herself.
With a cast that includes the brilliant Danica Curcic, and a visual tone that refuses to let viewers relax, the creative team behind The Reserve Netflix crime thriller wasn’t aiming for a cozy whodunit. They were building a psychological snare, scene by scene.
If you were wondering why so many critics are dissecting The Reserve Netflix production team, now you know. These are not people who make content. These are people who make cultural landmines.
The response to The Reserve hasn’t been lukewarm. It’s been polarized—and that’s a compliment. The series doesn’t play nice, and neither did the reviews. Some praised its elegance and restraint. Others squirmed at its moral discomfort. Either way, The Reserve Netflix reviews read less like critiques and more like confessions.
Audiences expecting tidy closure got slow-burning ambiguity. Those expecting redemption got a slab of psychological ambiguity wrapped in privilege and deflection. And somewhere in the middle of it all stood Marie Bach Hansen, not demanding sympathy—but holding it hostage.
The Reserve Netflix trailer promised darkness. The series delivered emotional fog, the kind that lingers in the lungs long after the credits roll. The performance, the pacing, the writing—it’s all calibrated to disturb equilibrium, not entertain.
Yes, The Reserve fits within the visual grammar of Nordic noir: the icy palettes, the scenic desolation, the quiet interiors where people implode behind closed doors. But what elevates it is its rejection of genre comfort.
This isn’t about a detective solving a murder. It’s about a community unraveling under the weight of its own denials. And The Reserve’s release date on Netflix didn’t just drop a new show—it introduced a new standard.
When viewers label a series “Nordic noir,” they usually expect a stylistic shrug of cold lighting and moral commentary. But The Reserve Netflix Nordic noir delivered something sharper, quieter, and far more insidious. It didn’t flirt with darkness. It weaponized it.
And as critics now trace the show’s psychological architecture back to its creators—and especially to Marie Bach Hansen’s performance—one thing is clear: The Reserve didn’t just contribute to the genre. It corrupted it, beautifully.
If you’re expecting a celebrity romance wrapped in champagne clichés, keep scrolling. Marie Bach Hansen’s relationship with Stefan Pasborg doesn’t read like a PR fairy tale—it reads like a collaboration between two people allergic to predictability. Pasborg, a jazz drummer known for disrupting rhythms as much as following them, isn’t just a musical genius. He’s a chaotic complement to Hansen’s control. Together, they orbit each other like jazz and structure—improvisational, layered, and anything but conventional.
There’s no curated couple aesthetic. No lifestyle brand. No performative hand-holding on red carpets. Instead, what you get from this pairing is creative volatility. Artistic overlap. A refusal to play the algorithm’s game. That’s why their pairing matters—not because it feeds the celebrity machine, but because it resists it.
And when people whisper about Marie Bach Hansen’s boyfriend or ask whether Stefan Pasborg and Marie Bach Hansen are “serious,” they’re missing the point. This isn’t a tabloid headline. It’s a long-form duet.
When you peel away the public roles, what remains between them is collaboration that doesn’t announce itself. You won’t find shared TikToks or cooking videos, but you will find influence. There’s a rhythm to Marie Bach Hansen’s performances that echoes Pasborg’s experimental timing—subtle, off-beat, often unsettling.
They’re not co-branding. They’re co-existing in the space where ideas crackle. It’s the kind of partnership that doesn’t seek attention, which is probably why it deserves it. In a world obsessed with documenting affection, Marie Bach Hansen and Stefan Pasborg’s relationship feels like a rare thing: private, productive, and perfectly illegible to outsiders.
Don’t mistake stillness for passivity. Marie Bach Hansen’s lifestyle isn’t performative—it’s strategic. Her version of self-care doesn’t come prepackaged in neutral-toned influencer kits. It comes through rituals of tension and release: bodywork, breathwork, stillness, repetition. Pilates, yes. But also pacing. Silence. Creative reset.
Her workout routine isn’t designed to “stay camera-ready.” It’s there to sustain the physical intelligence that drives her roles. She doesn’t sculpt herself for the screen. She tunes herself like an instrument. Because in her work, movement isn’t aesthetic—it’s narrative.
And when she disappears from the media circuit between projects, it’s not burnout. It’s rehearsal. For someone whose power comes from restraint, every choice is functional. You won’t see “Marie Bach Hansen’s diet” trending on wellness blogs. She’s too busy feeding her brain.
What keeps her sharp is not a fitness regime or a detox calendar—it’s attention. Reading. Sketching. Wandering galleries with too little lighting and too much emotional residue. Marie Bach Hansen’s daily routine is less about routine and more about ritual. Less about biohacking, more about absorbing the world without rushing to comment on it.
Her off-camera life rejects spectacle in favor of input. She reads more than she posts. She watches more than she speaks. And if that makes her a challenge for lifestyle journalists—good. That’s the point. She isn’t curating herself for your feed. She’s cultivating complexity for her next character.
In a digital world that rewards oversharing, Marie Bach Hansen’s Instagram presence is a masterclass in intentional distance. She’s visible, but never available. The grid isn’t curated to perform likability or push merchandise. There’s no “click to shop” moment. No sponsored wellness capsules. Just glimpses: a script’s corner, a flash of stage light, a quote scribbled on hotel stationery.
The brilliance of Marie Bach Hansen’s social media accounts lies in what they don’t say. She doesn’t sell lifestyle. She suggests mood. She doesn’t narrate her day. She edits it like a noir short film. Every post is an ellipsis, not an exclamation mark.
Fans follow her not for access, but for interpretation. Every photo feels like a clue. Every caption reads like a scene partner that just walked off stage. Her social presence isn’t audience outreach—it’s a curated ambiguity. And for someone whose greatest power is what she doesn’t reveal, it fits perfectly.
What makes Marie Bach Hansen’s official Instagram stand out in a sea of algorithm-friendly avatars is its refusal to perform intimacy. She doesn’t confess. She doesn’t comment on current trends to stay relevant. She disappears when she’s working, and reappears only when there’s something to show—not something to prove.
And yet, she’s not cold. She’s precise. Her social media feels like a performance in itself—carefully constructed to keep you intrigued, just enough to keep scrolling, never enough to feel entitled.
That’s the trick. In a world screaming for attention, Marie Bach Hansen whispers. And people lean in.
Awards don’t define talent—but they do tend to circle it like moths to a flame. In the case of Marie Bach Hansen, it’s less about how many statues she’s stacked and more about which ones dared to acknowledge her. When she was nominated for her role in Chorus Girls, critics weren’t just nodding politely—they were acknowledging that she had detonated the role with the same quiet explosiveness she brings to every performance.
The Marie Bach Hansen Robert Awards nomination wasn’t about glamour or buzz. It was a signal from the Danish film establishment that subtlety, psychological control, and narrative violence still matter. That nomination didn’t scream. It whispered—and everyone leaned in.
From there, the floodgates didn’t exactly open (Hansen’s career avoids cliché like a virus), but the radar locked in. Suddenly, Marie Bach Hansen’s awards column wasn’t just plausible. It was overdue.
Let’s be clear: Marie Bach Hansen’s nominations don’t come attached to high-budget campaigns or industry schmoozing. Her name doesn’t show up because someone had dinner with a voting committee. It shows up because she reshapes the roles she takes until they’re unignorable.
That’s why her nomination for Chorus Girls hit differently. It wasn’t a role that asked to be noticed. It was one that demanded to be understood. And when the Robert Awards spotlighted it, they weren’t just validating performance. They were validating difficulty—the kind that’s easy to overlook and impossible to forget.
When it comes to Marie Bach Hansen reviews, one trend becomes glaringly obvious: critics can’t ignore her. They may disagree on details—some call her chilling, others magnetic—but none walk away unmoved. Her work splits opinion like a scalpel through soft tissue, and that, frankly, is the point.
She’s not in the business of crowd-pleasing. She’s in the business of precision. And the critical reception to her roles reflects that. Whether it’s theater or film, local or international, the recurring praise is rooted in one thing—control. Even the harshest critics tend to admit she operates on a different voltage than most.
Describing Marie Bach Hansen’s acting style isn’t about adjectives—it’s about physics. Reviewers often talk about her density on screen: the way scenes bend around her, the way emotional gravity centers on her silence.
What’s especially consistent in the critical reception is an acknowledgment of her refusal to seduce the audience. She doesn’t chase empathy. She doesn’t soften characters to win approval. Instead, she inhabits them fully, flaws intact, edges sharpened. Critics don’t always know what to make of that. But they rarely forget it.
Method acting has become a bloated phrase. What Marie Bach Hansen does is more surgical—less about “becoming” the character and more about mapping every synapse, flaw, and rupture before stepping into their skin. Her acting method doesn’t start with costume fittings or dialect coaches. It starts with questions that most actors don’t want to ask.
What is this character pretending not to know? What truth are they resisting? What gesture do they suppress in every room they enter? Those are the entry points. The result is that Marie Bach Hansen’s acting style doesn’t look rehearsed. It looks inhabited—like she’s been living inside the tension long before the cameras rolled.
While her screen work has earned her international attention, it’s her roots as a theater actress that hardened her instincts. In theater, there’s no safety net. You can’t yell “cut.” You ride the emotional arc in real time, in front of hundreds of eyes, and it either breaks or burns.
Marie Bach Hansen’s years on stage taught her more than timing—they taught her stamina, spatial awareness, and how to weaponize stillness. Her performances are shaped by that legacy. She doesn’t perform for the screen. She dares it to keep up.
There’s nothing gimmicky about Marie Bach Hansen speaking English or navigating multiple languages on screen. It’s not just about pronunciation—it’s about rhythm, cultural nuance, and emotional timing. Her fluency isn’t cosmetic. It’s structural.
Whether she’s tackling Danish family drama or stepping into international cinema, she doesn’t just translate dialogue—she recalibrates it. Her ability to move between languages gives her characters a kind of elastic precision, where silence in one tongue feels different than silence in another.
That’s why Marie Bach Hansen’s international roles land differently than many multilingual actors. She isn’t switching gears—she’s expanding her emotional bandwidth.
In thrillers, dramas, and complex character studies, multilingualism becomes a tactical asset. For Marie Bach Hansen, it allows her to manipulate pace, tone, and energy in ways that most monolingual actors simply can’t. And in a world where scripts are increasingly global but emotionally shallow, that’s a power move.
The elegance of Marie Bach Hansen’s multilingual performances lies in their invisibility. She doesn’t announce her range. She deploys it—quietly, devastatingly, and with perfect control. It’s not a party trick. It’s an arsenal.
Let’s get one thing straight: Marie Bach Hansen doesn’t dress to impress. She dresses to disorient. Her presence on the red carpet isn’t about sparkle or trend compliance—it’s about control. Whether she’s in minimalist tailoring with the sharpness of a Danish dagger or a sculptural gown that reads more installation than eveningwear, she doesn’t follow fashion. She subverts it.
Unlike many actresses who treat red carpets like auditions for brand ambassadorships, Marie Bach Hansen’s fashion choices feel like a continuation of her roles: unpredictable, nuanced, and occasionally unsettling in their precision. There’s no “signature look” because that would imply predictability—something she treats like a virus.
And if her earlier stage work at Mungo Park hinted at a cerebral aesthetic, her recent appearances suggest she’s well aware of her visual impact. The transformation is subtle but deliberate. This isn’t a glow-up. This is evolution under surveillance. The cameras may flash, but Marie Bach Hansen’s style evolution never panders to them.
You won’t find ruffles or princess gowns in her closet. What you will find is structure, tension, and an acute understanding of silhouette as statement. Marie Bach Hansen’s red carpet appearances often walk the line between stark minimalism and quiet rebellion. She doesn’t dress for applause. She dresses like someone who could exit the carpet and walk into a courtroom drama without changing shoes.
Her fashion presence is quiet power dressed in monochrome. The looks aren’t cute. They’re composed. Every outfit feels like it could be used as evidence in a future noir film, which—frankly—is exactly on brand.
While some celebrities flood their feeds with paid partnerships that smell like desperation, Marie Bach Hansen’s endorsements are refreshingly rare—and razor sharp. When she collaborates with a fashion house or lends her presence to a campaign, it’s not because she’s trying to sell something. It’s because the alignment makes conceptual sense.
Her brand collaborations tend to come from designers who understand restraint. Think architectural silhouettes, emotionally ambiguous palettes, and zero tolerance for fast fashion fluff. In other words, she partners with brands who share her obsession with control and understatement.
The genius of these partnerships isn’t just in what she wears—it’s in how the brands leverage her persona. She’s not just a model in motion. She’s a mood.
When Marie Bach Hansen’s fashion partnerships appear, they don’t feel transactional. They feel thematic. Whether she’s quietly fronting a Nordic designer’s capsule collection or slipping into custom pieces for high-profile events, every stitch adds to her ongoing visual mythology.
She’s never been one to let clothes speak louder than she does. Instead, she lets them whisper at the same pitch—understated, intelligent, with just enough aesthetic threat to keep the room nervous. There’s no brand saturation. No overexposure. Just a selective visual strategy that makes the fashion world lean forward.
In short: Marie Bach Hansen doesn’t just “do” style. She edits it. And that edit cuts deep.
Cecilia Suárez – Wikipedia, UN Advocate for the Spotlight Initiative Cecilia Suárez on the gender-based violence activists who give her hope, Cecilia Suarez Smashed Clichés in ‘La Casa De Las Flores’ and Now ABC’s ‘Promised Land’, Cecilia Suarez | LATW – L.A. Theatre Works, List of filmography and awards of Cecilia Suárez – Wikipedia, Cecilia Suárez | Promised Land – ABC
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.